¶1concurring
¶2in part and dissenting in part.
¶3hi concur that respondent should be sanctioned, but I would not designate this disbarment as permanent under La. Sup. Ct. Rule XIX, Sects. 10(A)(1) and 24(A).
952 So. 2d 642
In re Spradling
Decided January 26, 2007
Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2007-01-26
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2007
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2007-01-26
View the full empirical analysis of this case →