In Re JB’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Watts v. Watts · McRae v. McRae · In re Nelson · Grand China, Inc. v. United National Insurance · Matter of Gendron
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“After considering the overarching statutory scheme in this area, as we must, we observe that the legislature has set forth too many alternative routes to establish parental status that do not require proof of biological ties for us to give the respondent's argument much weight. See, e.g. , RSA ch. 170-B (Supp. 2007) (outlining adoption procedures); RSA 458:23 (2004) (legitimacy of child presumed when born of a marriage entered into in good faith); RSA 168-A:2, I(a) (2002) (paternity may be established by voluntarily petitioning court). The petitioner's lack of a biological connection to [the child] is therefore not fatal to his request for parental rights and responsibilities under RSA chapter 461-A, so long as he alleges sufficient facts to establish his status as a parent by other means.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“such a limited definition of the term 'parent' when it repeatedly employed that term in RSA chapter 461-A.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“all rights and responsibilities parents have concerning their child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.