Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 953 A.2d 130 - Flamer v. State

Flamer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pointer v. Texas · Maryland v. Craig · Scott v. Hern · Wainwright v. State · Salazar v. City of Chicago

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Once a party introduces a portion of a recording or writing, the burden shifts to the other party to require the admission of all or part of the remainder of the recording or writing which ought in fairness be considered contemporaneously with it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The portions sought to be admitted (1) must be relevant to the issues and (2) only those parts which qualify or explain the subject matter of the portion offered by the opponent need be admitted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to prevent misleading impressions which often result from taking matters out of context.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.