Burrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Ornelas v. United States · McDougall v. North Carolina · Flamer v. State · Probst v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review de novo the Superior Court’s jury instructions and its interpretation of a statute.”); Burrell v. State, 953 A.2d 957, 960 (Del.2008) ("[T]his Court must review the correctness of the trial judge’s application of the law to [the trial court’s] factual findings. When a question of law is at issue, the standard of appellate review is de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harper v. State“[a] trial court's jury instructions are not a ground for reversal if they are reasonably informative and not misleading when judged by common practices and standards of verbal communication.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bradley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.