Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 953 F.2d 198 - Sterling Na v. Block

Sterling Na v. Block’s Empirical Analysis

953 F.2d 198 · 1992

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
4
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Laborers' International Union v. Foster Wheeler Corp. (1994), Tel-Phonic Services, Inc. v. TBS International, Inc. (1992)

12 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

230199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Griffith v. Kentucky · Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson · Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams · James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the rule was retroactively applied to the parties in the case in which it was originally announced.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it is properly understood to have followed the normal rule of retroactive application in civil cases.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Louisiana's request-notice statute did not remedy the constitutional insufficiency of its constructive notice provision for foreclosures. A creditor "who avails itself of state foreclosure procedures is constitutionally obligated to provide `notice reasonably calculated, under all circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action.'" Davis Oil, 873 F.2d at 788, quoting Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306 , 70 S.Ct. 652 , 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950). A party with an interest in property does not waive its due process rights by failing to request notice under the Louisiana statute. Id. at 788. Accordingly, a creditor retains the duty to provide notice to interested parties whose identity is reasonably ascertainable or, as is alleged in this case, actually known.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.