Bachman v. Leapley’s Empirical Analysis
953 F.2d 440 · 1992
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2023
14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Joseph v. United States · Gregory v. Frontier Materials, Inc. · Musser v. States · Thomas v. Southtrust Bank of Alabama · United States v. Azure
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is the exclusive province of the jury to determine the believability of the witness ... [a]n expert is not permitted to offer an opinion as to the believability or truthfulness of a victim's story.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.