Harwin v. Goleta Water District’s Empirical Analysis
953 F.2d 488 · 1991
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Buckley v. Valeo · New York v. Ferber · Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley · First National Bank of Boston v. X Bellotti · Carey v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under either [equal protection or first amendment] analysis, ... independent justification of the discrimination is required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“for content-based distinctions); Mosley, 408 U.S. 92 , 95, 92 S.Ct. 2286, 2290, 33 L.Ed.2d 212 (1972) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[c]ities certainly have a substantial interest in stopping picketing which disrupts a school.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.