Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

953 F.2d 637

Docket No. 91-7690.

Bolling v. D Smith Ma

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Jan. 9, 1992. Decided Jan. 31, 1992.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Birch v. Bicoastal Corp.

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-91-384-R)

Dwayne Robinson Bolling, appellant pro se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Dwayne Robinson Bolling appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bolling v. Smith, No. CA-91-384-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 17, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/953/f2d/637 · .json · Public domain