Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 953 F.2d 877 - Chevalier v. Reliance Insurance

Chevalier v. Reliance Insurance’s Empirical Analysis

953 F.2d 877 · 1992

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently October 2024

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

1101992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crawford Fitting Company v. Jt Gibbons Inc Champion International Corporation · Cryts v. French · Jannotti v. United States · Francis v. United States · Bitoun v. Landry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “absent an express indication from the Louisiana legislature, or its courts, of Louisiana's special interest in providing litigants with recovery of expert witness fees in a personal injury action, federal law controls the award of such fees as costs.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a borrowing can occur whenever the named insured properly gains the use of a third party's ... vehicle for its purposes, no matter who has dominion or control of the car.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “arbitrary, capricious, or without probable cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.