Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 953 F.2d 960 - John E. Fontenot v. Nl Industries, Inc.

John E. Fontenot v. Nl Industries, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
2
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 7 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Bogue v. Ampex Corp. (1992), Schonholz v. Long Island Jewish Medical Center (1996)

29 federal appellate · 7 district · 4 state decisions

440199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne · Grogan v. Garner · Hamilton ex rel. Smith v. Texas · Pane v. Rca Corporation · Wells v. General Motors Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The theoretical possibility of a one-time obligation in the future simply creates no need for an ongoing administrative program for processing claims and paying benefits.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) it simply requires that the employer make a one-time, lump-sum payment triggered by a single event that might never occur, (2) it does not require an administrative scheme to meet this obligation, and (3) the employer does not assume responsibility for making regular benefit payments.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the circumstances of each employee's termination ... in light of certain criteria”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.