Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 953 F.3d 67 - da Silva v. de Aredes

da Silva v. de Aredes’s Empirical Analysis

2020

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 22 U.S.C. § 9001 · 22 U.S.C. § 9003

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Pierce v. Underwood · Colorado v. New Mexico · U. S. Bank N. A. v. Village at Lakeridge, LLC · John Walsh Jacqueline Walsh and Martha Miller Intervenor John Walsh Jacqueline Walsh and Martha Miller Intervenor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he appropriate standard of appellate review for a mixed question [of law and fact] 'depends . . . on whether answering it entails primarily legal or factual work.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'now settled' defense[] require[s] the court to identify a broad standard and then answer the factual question[] of . . . whether the abducted child is 'now settled.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[c]ourts look to the totality of the circumstances in determining whether a child is now settled.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.