State v. Wanlass’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Thurston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where a defendant is aware that there is no guarantee the court will agree to follow the prosecutor's recommendation, there is no reason to set aside a guilty plea [as involuntary] if the court did not follow the prosecutor's recommendation, even if the defendant is disappointed with the severity of the sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“advise the defendant [of its decision to enter a different sentence] and then call upon the defendant to either affirm or withdraw the plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The fact that defendant is disappointed with the sentence imposed does not mean it is improper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.