Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 953 P2D 494 - Johnson v. Olympic Liquidating Trust

Johnson v. Olympic Liquidating Trust’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2019

12 state decisions

80199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc. · Gates v. City of Tenakee Springs · Wooten v. . Walters · A & G Const. Co., Inc. v. Reid Brothers Logging Co., Inc. · Martech Construction Co. v. Ogden Environmental Services, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) Except when the court finds that the parties have agreed otherwise, prejudgment interest accrues from the day process is served on the defendant or the day the defendant received written notification that an injury has occurred and that a claim may be brought against the defendant for that injury, whichever is earlier. The written notification must be of a nature that would lead a prudent person to believe that a claim will be made against the person receiving the notification, for personal injuty, death, or damage to property.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “All reasonable factual inferences must be drawn in favor of the party opposing summary judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A superior court's grant of summary judgment must be affirmed if the evidence in the record fails to disclose a genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.