953 So. 2d 224 - Carter v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 920 So. 2d 465 - Jones v. State · 904 So. 2d 149 - Jones v. State · 757 So. 2d 925 - Fielder v. Magnolia Beverage Co. · 784 So. 2d 148 - Baldwin v. State · 566 So. 2d 1266 - Rester v. Lott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State“breaking and entering [of a] dwelling house ... of another, whether armed with a deadly weapon or not, and whether there shall be at the time some human being in such dwelling house or not, with intent to commit some crime therein ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The defendant's intent was a necessary element for his conviction, and his prior felony convictions were admitted for limited purposes, permissible under Rule 404(b), including intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.