Ex Parte Robey’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Douglas v. People of State of California · Mempa v. Rhay · Woolf v. McGaugh · 946 So. 2d 536 - Ex Parte Seymour · Lancaster v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The law in Alabama regarding a trial court’s personal and subject-matter jurisdiction over a criminal defendant is convoluted, and the definition of subject-matter jurisdiction, i.e., a trial court’s authority to render judgment and to impose sentence, is tortured with inaccuracy and confusion. This Court should seize the first opportunity to clarify the definition of a trial court’s subject-matter jurisdiction in a criminal case.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Turner v. State · Banks v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.