Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 953 SO2D 786 - State v. Walker

State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2021

7 state decisions

40200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Katz v. United States · United States v. Leon · Payton v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]ven granting “the overriding respect for the sanctity of the home that has been embedded in our traditions since the origins of the Republic,” Payton, 445 U.S. at 601 , 100 S.Ct. 1371 (footnote omitted), it has long been settled that a person may not frustrate an otherwise lawful arrest on probable cause which the police are entitled to make in a public place without a warrant, United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 , 96 S.Ct. 820 , 46 L.Ed.2d 598 (1976), simply by stepping across the threshold of his home. United States v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38, 43 , 96 S.Ct. 2406 , 49 L.Ed.2d 300 (1976) (“ [A] suspect may not defeat an arrest which has been set in motion in a public place, and is therefore proper under Watson, by the expedient of escaping to a private place.”).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Officer Schnapp's observation of an apparent drug deal followed by the defendant's flight on approach of the `stacked patrol' gave the police the requisite reasonable suspicion, i.e., minimal level of objective justification, to pursue and detain their suspect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.