Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 953 SO2D 849 - State v. Hill

State v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Weber v. A.P. Green Industries, Inc. · 843 So. 2d 641 - Bankers Ins. Co. v. State · Moore v. Safeway Insurance Co. · 756 So. 2d 565 - State v. International Fidelity Ins. Co. · State v. Matteson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All bonds taken to secure the appearance of any person before any court executed in the state of Louisiana shall be forfeited and collected as follows: (1)Failure to appear and answer. If at the time fixed for appearance the defendant fails to appear and answer when called, the judge, on motion of the prosecuting attorney, upon hearing of proper evidence including: the bail contract; the power of attorney if any; and the notice to the defendant and the surety as required by Article 344 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, shall immediately and forthwith issue a warrant for the arrest of the person failing to appear and order a judgment decreeing the forfeiture of the bond and against the defendant and his sureties in solido for the full amount of the bond. (2) Signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture. Following the defendant’s failure to appear, the court shall sign a written judgment of bond forfeiture. (3) Notice of judgment. (a) After entering the fact of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture in the court minutes, the clerk of court shall promptly mail notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture. The notice of the signing of the judgment shall be mailed by United States certified mail with return receipt to all of the following: 19(i) The defendant at the address designated pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 322. (ii) The personal sureties at the addresses designated pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 322. (iii) The agent or bondsman”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.