Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

953 S.W.2d 955

State v. Wilkewitz

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1997

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1997-10-28

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-10-28

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2020

5 state decisions

201997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2The trial court convicted Barry Wilkewitz of two counts of driving while intoxicated and two counts of driving while revoked. On appeal, he alleges that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to convict and sentence him. He contends the State failed to bring him to trial within 180 days of his request for final disposition as required by the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act (UMDDA), Section 217.450, et seq. RSMo 1994.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not lack jurisdiction to convict and sentence Defendant. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/953/sw2d/955 · .json · Public domain