Hill v. Ibarra’s Empirical Analysis
954 F.2d 1516 · 1992
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably Jones v. Runyon (1996), Duncan v. Manager, Department of Safety (2005)
19 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 651 (§ 451 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 654 (§ 454 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 657 (§ 457 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Parratt v. Taylor · Daniels v. Williams · Baker v. McCollan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“grant of summary judgment ... may be upheld on any grounds supported by the record”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'To state a valid cause of action under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege the deprivation by defendant of a right, privilege, or immunity secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States while the defendant was acting under color of state law.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Munoz v. Munoz · Doe v. Bagan“It would seem virtually tautological that when a statute imposes conditions or qualifications on any right or benefit granted therein, such prerequisites must be satisfied before any enforceable statutory entitlement can be said to exist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Marturello v. Angus
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.