Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 954 F.2d 182 - United States v. Davis

United States v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

954 F.2d 182 · 1992

Citation profile

209
cited by 209 later decisions
5
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

99 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 209 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably United States v. Blick (2005), United States v. General (2002)

99 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

13801992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · North Carolina v. Alford · Hullum v. United States · Quantum Chemical Corp. v. Pratt · Universal Cooperatives, Inc. v. FCX, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 209 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “must prove that failure to allow withdrawal of the guilty plea would result in a 'miscarriage of justice'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Because courts construe international treaties as equivalent in supremacy to validly enacted federal law, the principle of specialty articulated by the ... Extradition Treaty must be considered no more than a statutorily created right. Protection of this right does not rise to the level of fundamentality that this court has traditionally demanded before addressing a question of law not argued at the district court level.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.