United States v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis
954 F.2d 270 · 1992
Citation profile
58 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2017 · most notably Johnson v. United States (2000), Johnson v. United States (2000)
58 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 751
Relies on United States v. Behnezhad · United States v. Boling
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“generally means cancel or rescind. Once a term of supervised release has been revoked under § 3583(e)(3), there is nothing left to extend, modify, reduce, or enlarge under § 3583(e)(2). The term of release no longer exists. 17 Id. at 272. Holmes implicitly declined to support Behnezhad's disjunctive analysis by stating that the meaning of”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"The Court may ... (1)terminate a term of supervised release and discharge the person released at any time after the expiration of one year of supervised release ... (2) extend a term of supervised release if less than the maximum authorized term was previously imposed, and may modify, reduce, or enlarge the conditions of supervised release (3) revoke a term of supervised release, and require the person to serve in prison all or part of the term of supervised release without credit for time previously served on postre-lease supervision ... (4) order the person to remain at his place of residence during nonworking hours_” 18 U.S.C. § 3583 (e).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“unenacted legislation has no interpretative value,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.