United States v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
954 F.2d 379 · 1992
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably United States v. Jenkins (1993), United States v. Beals (2012)
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Taylor v. Illinois · Rosenberg v. Comerica Bank · Austin Products Co. v. Workers' Compensation Insurers Rating Association of Minnesota · Cupp v. Naughten
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'balanc[e] the public interest in protecting the flow of information against the individual's right to prepare a defense.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“If the evidence upon which a defendant is convicted was secured personally by government agents who testified, the government is not required to produce the cooperating individual.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“does not, however, require the government to call every witness competent to testify, including special agents or informers.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.