Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 954 F.2d 586 - United States v. Byrd

United States v. Byrd’s Empirical Analysis

954 F.2d 586 · 1992

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
January 2000
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 245 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 875

Relies on United States v. Penagos · United States v. Bos · United States v. McCall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “2 plus the offense level applicable to any underlying offense.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[o]nce jurisdiction is established over the offense of conviction, such jurisdictional requirements are irrelevant in computing a sentence.” Byrd, 954 F.2d at 589 . 8 . The Guidelines define “seriously bodily injury” as”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.