Brown v. Busch’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2010
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Estelle v. Gamble · Thomas v. Arn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“tiers” of hearings to determine allegations of inmate disciplinary rule violations, structured generally by range of punishment. A”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Davidson v. Murray“Rule 107.10 provides: Inmates shall not physically or verbally obstruct or interfere with an employee at any time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Davidson v. Murray“Inmates shall not, under any circumstances make any threat, spoken, in writing, or by gesture.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Davidson v. Murray
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.