State v. Sagastegui’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
October 2009
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Whitmore v. Arkansas · 117 Wash. 2d 829 - State v. Lord · 125 Wash. 2d 570 - State v. Gentry · State v. Stenson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Mentally retarded" means the individual has: (i) Significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning; (ii) existing concurrently with deficits in adaptive behavior; and (iii) both significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning and deficits in adaptive behavior were manifested during the developmental period.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Elledge · State v. Elledge“This requires us to determine if the record supports its holding that the defendant (1) had the capacity (or competency) to understand his options, and (2) was provided with the requisite information to enable him to make a knowing, voluntary, and intelligent decision to waive a general appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Elledge · State v. Elledge“knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Elledge · State v. Woods
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.