Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 954 P.2d 894 - State v. JPS

State v. JPS’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2021

9 state decisions

601998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 1 Cal. 3d 855 - Nino v. Gladys R. · 221 Cal. App. 3d 43 - People v. Paul C. · 102 Wash. 2d 19 - State v. QD · 75 Wash. App. 404 - State v. Linares

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) [T]he nature of the crime; (2) the child's age and maturity; (3) whether the child showed a desire for secrecy; (4) whether the child admonished the victim not to tell; (5) prior conduct similar to that charged; (6) any consequences that attached to the conduct; and (7) acknowledgment that the behavior was wrong and could lead to detention.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Children of eight and under twelve years of age are presumed to be incapable of committing crime, but this presumption may be removed by proof that they have sufficient capacity to understand the act or neglect, and to know that it was wrong.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When a child is accused of a crime which involves sexual misconduct, it is more difficult for the State to prove the child understood the conduct was wrong.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.