Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 954 SO2D 174 - Jinright v. Glass

Jinright v. Glass’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 294 So. 2d 485 - Conner v. Continental Southern Lines, Incorporated · Wadsworth v. Alexius · 844 So. 2d 282 - Hudson v. EAST BATON ROUGE SCHOOL BD. · Breaux v. Vicknair · 570 So. 2d 548 - Mejia v. Lineas Maritimas De Santo Domingo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Prescription is interrupted when the owner commences action against the possessor, or when the obligee commences action against the obligor, in a court of competent jurisdiction and venue. If action is commenced in an incompetent court, or in an improper venue, prescription is interrupted only as to a defendant served by process within the prescriptive period.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “However, the proper person, as designated by law, must be served before service of process will interrupt the running of prescription. The Code of Civil Procedure does not authorize that a distinction be drawn between the persons to be served for the purpose of interrupting prescription and those to be served for other purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.