Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 954 SO2D 944 - Taylor v. State

Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 208 So. 2d 886 - Carr v. State · 863 So. 2d 31 - Mississippi Transp. Comm'n v. McLemore · 671 So. 2d 647 - Peterson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “... if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.