Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

954 S.W.2d 15

State v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1997

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1997-10-14

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1998

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-10-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Louis Williams, Defendant, appeals from his jury conviction for first degree robbery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not plainly err in allowing certain arguments by the prosecuting attorney. Rule 29.12(b). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/954/sw2d/15 · .json · Public domain