Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 954 SW2D 570 - State v. Gilpin

State v. Gilpin’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably State v. Hibler (2000), State v. Smith (2000)

28 state decisions

220199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Carolco Television Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co. · CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Easterwood · Invex Holdings, N.V. v. Equitable Life Insurance · Roos v. Bancfirst of Sulphur

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The burden shall be on the movant to demonstrate that the untimeliness is not the result of negligence or intentional conduct of the movant.... If the court determines that the untimeliness resulted from negligence or intentional conduct of movant, the court shall not permit the filing.... If the court determines that the untimeliness of the amended motion resulted exclusively from counsel’s action or inaction, the court shall consider the amended mo tion as having been timely filed and proceed according to the provisions of the rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “will not support a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel unless the defendant clearly establishes otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.