David v. David’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 72
Relies on Woolridge v. Woolridge · Rombach v. Rombach · Marriage of Hogan v. Hogan · Monsees v. Monsees · Lenger v. Lenger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Section 169.572 ... requires that Missouri teacher retirement accounts, which are in lieu of social security, be treated in the same manner as social security benefits. Social Security benefits are unassignable, and cannot be awarded as part of the division of property.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'in the case of teacher retirement accounts, the court is not to permit the consideration of the retirement account to”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Foraker v. Foraker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.