¶1ORDER
¶2John D. Sexton appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that Mr. Sexton’s motion was untimely filed and, therefore, affirm the motion court’s ruling. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order and have furnished the parties with a memorandum setting forth our reasoning. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).