United States v. Caba’s Empirical Analysis
955 F.2d 182 · 1992
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably United States v. Pitre (1992), United States v. Saro (1994)
21 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · North Carolina v. Butler · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Colorado v. Spring
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“However, where the court finds that the defendant did not intend to produce and was not reasonably capable of producing the negotiated amount, the court shall exclude from the guideline calculation the amount that it finds the defendant did not intend to produce and was not reasonably capable of producing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A]fter a motion to suppress a confession has been denied, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the government.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.