16455a Baker v. Secretary of Health and Human Services’s Empirical Analysis
955 F.2d 552 · 1992
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Baldwin v. Barnhart (2003), Orrick v. Sullivan (1992)
19 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Consolo v. Federal Maritime Commission · Polaski v. Heckler · McCoy v. Schweiker · Benskin v. Bowen · O'Leary v. Schweiker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the claimant's daily activities; (2) the subjective evidence of the duration, frequency, and intensity of the claimant's pain; (3) any precipitating or aggravating factors; (4) the dosage, effectiveness and side effects of any medication; and (5) the claimant's functional restrictions.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve months.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“No one, including the ALJ, disputes that plaintiff has pain.... The question is `whether she is fully credible when she claims that her back hurts so much that it prevents her from engaging in her prior work.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.