Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 955 F.2d 660 - Bregman v. Alderman

Bregman v. Alderman’s Empirical Analysis

955 F.2d 660 · 1992

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
January 2016
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2016

6 federal appellate ·

140199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer · Conway v. Statesman Mortgage Co. · Strawbridge v. Curtiss · Gravitt v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. · Strawbridge v. Curtiss

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The [district] court concluded that it did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the case because diversity was not apparent from the face of the pleadings.... The district court's conclusion may well have been mistaken, ... [but] we conclude that the remand order in this case was based upon lack of subject matter jurisdiction^]”); see also Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ward Trucking Corp., 48 F.3d 742, 750 (3d Cir.1995) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he District Court's remand order was plainly within the bounds of § 1447(c) and hence was unreviewable by the Court of Appeals, by mandamus or otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]f at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.