In re: FBOP Execution Protocol Cases’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1905 · 18 U.S.C. § 3591 (§ 60002 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 3592 · 18 U.S.C. § 3596 (§ 60002 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 3597 (§ 60002 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 2106 · 28 U.S.C. § 509 (Justice Department Organized Crime and Drug Enforcement Enhancement Act of 1988)
Relies on Gregg v. Georgia · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Rose v. Lundy · Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Eddings v. Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“See In re Federal Bureau of Prisons' Execution Protocol Cases , 955 F.3d 106 , 108 (CADC 2020) ( per curiam ) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in the manner prescribed by the law of the State in which the sentence is imposed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Each member of the panel takes a different view of what the FDPA requires”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.