Sabo v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Bloodsworth v. Heckler · Hale v. Bowen · McDaniel v. Bowen · Edwards v. Sullivan · Rose v. Shalala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“CFS ... may produce symptoms which 'significantly impair [a] claimant's ability to perform even sedentary work ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reddick v. Chater
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.