Flanders v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Woods v. State · Hardin v. State · Wrinkles v. State · Wickizer v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) A person who: (1) being at least eighteen (18) years of age, commits an offense described in: (B) IC 35-42-4-2 (before its repeal on July 1, 2014); ⅜ ⅜ ⅝ ⅝ is a sexually violent predator. Except as provided in subsection (g) or (h), a person is a sexually violent predator by operation of law if an offense committed by the person satisfies the conditions set forth in subdivision (1) or (2) and the person was released from incarceration, secure detention, probation, or parole for the offense after June 30,1994. ⅜ ⅜ # ⅝ ⅜ (d) At the sentencing hearing, the court shall indicate on the record whether the person has been convicted of an offense that makes the person a sexually violent predator under subsection (b). 5¡? * * ‡ (f) If a person is a sexually violent predator: (1) the person is required to -register with the local law enforcement authority as provided in IC 11-8-8; and (2) the court shall send notice to the department of correction. (g) A person who is a sexually violent predator may petition the court to consider whether the person should no longer be considered a sexually violent predator. The person may file a petition under this subsection not earlier than ten (10) years after: (1) the sentencing court or juvenile court makes its determination under subsection (e); or (2) the-person is released from incarceration or secure detention.[ 2 ]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“that a 2007 amendment that eliminated [Flanders'] eligibility to petition the court for termination of his SVP status is an ex post facto law that is unconstitutional as applied to Flanders.” Id. at 735 . The violation was to be remedied”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.