People v. Dumas’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2017
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · Horton v. California · Minnesota v. Dickerson · Florida v. Jimeno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“what would the typical reasonable person have understood by the exchange between the officer and the suspect?”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Minor · People v. Collins“the trial court's factual determinations will be upheld on appeal unless they are clearly erroneous.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Arapu · People v. Minor“A warrant-less search conducted on the basis of consent is limited by the terms given by the consenting party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Arapu
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.