Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 955 P.2d 68 - People v. Paynter

People v. Paynter’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
11
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably State v. Garcia-Cantu (2008), State v. Rankin (2004)

39 state decisions — followed in 11 states

3001998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Mendenhall · Florida v. Bostick · Brown v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[d]uring a consensual interview, a police officer seeks the voluntary cooperation of an individual by asking non-coercive questions. A citizen is free to leave at any time during such an encounter or to ignore the police officer's questions.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “While most citizens will respond to a police request, the fact that people do so, and do so without being told they are free not to respond, hardly eliminates the consensual nature of the response.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[only when the officer, by means of physical force or show of authority, has in some way restrained the liberty of a citizen may we conclude that a 'seizure' has occurred.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.