955 P.2d 734
69 O.B.A.J. 1217
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 24, 1998
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · decided 1998-03-24
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2019
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relies on Conover v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1998-03-24
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1concurring in results.
¶2¶ 1 I concur in results by reason of stare decisis. I maintain my disagreement with the majority in its interpretation of the new post-conviction relief statute as I expressed in Conover v. State, 1997 OK CR 39 ¶¶ 1-5, 942 P.2d 229, 234-35, (Lane, J., concur in result).