Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 955 P.2d 892 - Miller v. State

Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2012

11 state decisions

80199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Martin v. State · United States v. Barboa · State v. Darwin · State v. Null · 193 N.J. Super. 133 - State v. Conway

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A person is guilty of conspiracy to commit a crime if he agrees with one (1) or more persons that they or one (1) or more of them will commit a crime and one (1) or more of them does an overt act to effect the objective of the agreement.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Baker v. State · Palato v. State
  2. “Under a unilateral formulation, the crime is committed when a person agrees to proceed in a prohibited manner; under a bilateral formulation, the crime of conspiracy is committed when two or more persons agree to proceed in such manner.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Baker v. State · Lemus v. State of Wyoming
  3. “such an approach is justified in that a man who believes that he is conspiring to commit a crime and wishes to conspire to commit a crime has a guilty mind and has done all in his power to plot the commission of an unlawful purpose.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Baker v. State · Lemus v. State of Wyoming

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.