¶1Affirmed. See § 921.16, Fla. Stat. (2005)(when a sentence is silent as to whether two cases charged under a different information or indictment are consecutive or concurrent, the sentences shall run consecutively). See also Whipple v. Department of Corrections, 892 So.2d 554, 557 (Fla. 3d DCA2005).
955 So. 2d 35
Sanders v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 14, 2007
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2007-03-14
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2014
3 state decisions
Relies on Whipple v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2007-03-14
View the full empirical analysis of this case →