Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

955 So. 2d 49

Adams v. Zarate

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2007-03-21

Relies on 377 So. 2d 1150 - Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee · Smith v. State · 946 So. 2d 60 - Schmitt v. Maile

Decided 2007-03-21

PER CURIAM.

¶1Danny Lee Adams, (“former husband”), appeals the trial court’s order approving the general master’s report and income deduction order awarding Debora Jo Za-rate, (“former wife”), child support payments. The former husband raises numerous points on appeal, but has failed to present a transcript of the proceedings or prepare a factual statement of the proceedings. Thus, the record presented is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. See Schmitt v. Maile, 946 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Mayfield v. Mayfield, 929 So.2d 671 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, *50377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). Accordingly, we must affirm.

¶2Affirmed.

/955/so2d/49 · .json · Public domain