¶1The order denying Appellant’s emergency motions for reclarification of sentence is affirmed, without prejudice to his right to exhaust all administrative remedies with the Department of Corrections. If the department fails to implement the earlier orders clarifying and amending his sentences, he may then seek mandamus relief against the Department of Corrections in the circuit court. See Davis v. State, 943 So.2d 975 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Smith v. State, 785 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
955 So. 2d 644
Priester v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 2, 2007
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2007-05-02
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 2010
2 state decisions
Relies on Pierre v. State · Davis v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2007-05-02
View the full empirical analysis of this case →