Gilmer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
60 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably 75 So. 3d 1024 - Lawson v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2011), Mississippi Methodist Hospital & Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. Mississippi Division of Medicaid (2009)
60 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hamling v. United States · Marks v. United States · Bouie v. City of Columbia · Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc. · Busic v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An indictment must contain (1) the essential elements of the offense charged, (2) sufficient facts to fairly inform the defendant of the charge against which he must defend, and (3) sufficient facts to enable him to plead double jeopardy in the event of a future prosecution for the same offense.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he first question ... is whether the statute is ambiguous. When a statute is unambiguous, this Court applies the plain meaning of the statute and refrains from the use of statutory construction princip[les]. The [C]ourt may not enlarge or restrict a statute where the meaning of the statute is clear. In interpreting statutes, this Court's primary objective is to employ that interpretation which best suits the legislature's true intent or meaning.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“the evidence is of such quality that reasonable and fairminded jurors in the exercise of fair and impartial judgment might reach different conclusions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.