Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 955 SW2D 603 - State v. Levandowski

State v. Levandowski’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2015

20 state decisions

110199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Owens v. State · Carson Creek Vacation Resorts, Inc. v. State, Department of Revenue · Cohen v. Cohen · Beare Co. v. Tennessee Department of Revenue · State v. Bobo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Report to a law enforcement officer an offense or incident within the officer’s concern: (A) Knowing the offense or incident did not occur; or (B) Knowing the person reporting has no information relating to the offense or incident; or (C) Knowing the information relating to the offense is false; or (2) Intentionally initiate or circulate a report of a past, present, or impending bombing, fire, or other emergency, knowing that the report is false or baseless and knowing: (A) It will cause action of any sort by an official or volunteer agency organized to deal with those emergencies; or (B) It will place a person in fear of imminent serious bodily injury; or (C) It will prevent or interrupt the occupation of any building, place of assembly, form of conveyance, or any other place to which the public has access.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.