Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

955 S.W.2d 795

Withouse v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 11, 1997

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1997-11-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2006

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-11-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2John Withouse (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief as untimely. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/955/sw2d/795 · .json · Public domain