Dailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
August 2025
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Luce v. United States · Claudio v. State · Keys v. State · Flonnory v. State · Daniels v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We note that this last requirement arguably differs ¡rom § 3507 and Keys’ foundational requirement.... We are unsure what to make of the phrase: ‘rendering such prior statement admissible under § 3507 of this title....’”). 11 . Id. 12 . See id. (explaining that because the statement in that case was admissible under § 3507, the court could”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Russell v. State“(b) An out of court statement may be admitted as provided in subsection (a) of this section if; (1) The child is present and the child's testimony touches upon the event and is subject to cross-examination rendering such prior statement admissible under § 3507 of this title; or”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Russell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.