Randall v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis
956 F.2d 105 · 1992
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Halray Harman v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (2000), Loza v. Apfel (2000)
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Cook v. Heckler · Emory v. Sullivan · Ransom v. Heckler · Anderson v. Schweiker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because of the medical record, we think it unconscionable to remand this eight-year-old case to the Secretary for further review”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.